(via iseeyoueverywhere)
This image is so awesome - it is a shame I don’t find a reference to the photographer - any hints???

(via iseeyoueverywhere)
This image is so awesome - it is a shame I don’t find a reference to the photographer - any hints???

on my way from Berlin to Stuttgart this morning.
Note to self: invent a device that is capable of lifting up a view camera into the air and keep it absolutely steady for several minutes, to do arial night shootings at a never before seen quality.
What is technically possible with current high ISO technology (Nikon D3x) can be seen here - the images are interesting, but the noise and blurryness is absolutely disturbing from a large format photographers view ;)
Inspiration from My Bookshelf #1
TODAY: Floriane de Lassée - Night Views
-
(this series is about books I have in my bookshelf that inspired me a lot)
A friend of mine once strolled through galleries in Bejing and told me, he saw a Photographer that was doing stuff like like I do. So I researched a bit. It was at the Paris Bejing Art Gallery and it turned out to be a female french urban large format photographer by the name of Floriane de Lassée. Apparently she is very young and uses a 4x5 inch camera. I found out that she had a book on sale at amazon and so I instantly bought it!

The book consists of 96 Pages, has been published by Nazraeli Press (ISBN: 978-1590052280) and contains 41 Images. It features an Introduction by Virginie Luc. The printing quality is not the best luxury thing you have ever seen, but it is ok.
What counts are the images! They have been shot from rooftops and balconys in New York, Tokyo, Shanghai, Paris and Istanbul. That is what I love. And how sweet the spots are! I wonder how she managed everything, because this is my single most concern, how to get permissions for publicly unaccessible spots like Rooftops on office towers etc. To give you some impressions:



See more inspiring images at her website! http://www.florianedelassee.com/site/beijing-night-views-2008/ (this also contains images not in the book)
For a complete reference of contained Images look here and here.
And finally, an image I found on Flickr, that shows her during work. I always marvel when I see some fellow large format freak in an urban environment doing what I love. This seems so unreal, but at least it shows, that we are not alone!
If you would like to buy the book, it is still available at amazon.com - here
and I can’t do much about it. It just hurts and keeps me from doing important things. Hopefully this will be gone by the end of the week.
The list is sorted alphabetically by country, then by city. The Number indicates the Population within the metropolitan area, as found on Wikipedia. I can’t wait to put checkmarks on every single city on the list!
Why ain’t there a 100? Well, I want to leave 10 wild cards to fill later, because I simply can’t predict which other wonderful cities come in to my mind within the next three years.
Hello my dear readers,
as you read the title, you may think “what a pussy, I take a 1000 pictures on one day, so what kind of challenge is that?”. Well, as you know I shoot 8x10 large format, which requires analog film and a lot of caring for every single photo. (Read my last post to know what it takes).
So what is a 1000 published pictures in a 1000 days about?
Simply put:
I intend to publish 1 image every single day for a consecutive 1000 days.
What do I mean by publishing? By publishing I mean making the image available for sale through my gallery site. If you take a look at my current gallery, you might get an impression what I deem to be publishable. The image has to be tack sharp and with perfect colour. Ready to be printed at 72 by 90 inch. An image really has to go a long way to fulfill this claim.
Regarding that ambition, a 1000 pictures is a heavy batch to keep interesting for every single day! This means I can not take pictures of Potsdamer Platz every day - (where I live and which is one of the few urban places in Berlin). This means I have to get out. Travel the world and explore every single city I have on my 100 places to visit list. This will keep the quality high and my inspiration and motivation levels as well! And also this will be the key element for everyone to revisit the gallery and get thrilled again and again.
About the financial Aspect
I presented the math earlier: to be able to make an image that can be published, I consider I need to make 5 images - that would be a 20% success rate, which seems unreal in digital times. Anyway, that would mean to publish a 1.000 images I would need to shoot 5.000 - which amounts to 60.000€. This is an amount of money that takes me almost 2 years in my current job to earn, but I spend it all on basic things already - so there is no way in doing this as a hobby! I have written down the details within this post - this indicates that finally I have to make 12.000€ a month to survive and keep the rate of published pictures at 1 per day. Selling that much to people I do not know seems fairly unrealistic, I will work on that issue for the next few months.
The Scheduling Aspect
Let’s take a look back to get a better grip on my possible production rate and succes rate:
This means that since I started 8x10 large format in the middle of 2008, I only shot 139 images! You remeber Cartier-Bresson, who told us “your first 10.000 images are your worst”? If I apply that to my 8x10 endeavours, that would mean another 140 years of bad imagery. That must not happen!
How much time will I spend on a published image?
That would leave me with 9 hrs left for the rest of my life including sleeping and travel, which I have to do quite a lot if I am to visit a 100 cities. Plus this leaves me with absolut no time for a daytime job!
So 1 image published a day is the absolute maximum!
I probably could outsource the scanning and de-dusting process, if I earn enough money - this would leave me with more time for scouting and organizing my online life.
I will put all weels in motion to start on 06.04.2010 so that Day #1000 is on 31.12.2012.
This post describes my process of creating an 8x10 image in urban surrounding in detail. It is not a quick read, but mainly a resource I can quote to answer the questions about my working process.
I will shoot a video for every single step in the future and put up a direct link here, so that you can see me work eye to eye.
So here we go:
Phew, what a long Post! If you have any further Questions, feel free to post them, I will be glad to embed the answer into the description.
After reading my theory on what is a good photo, it is quite interesting to find how different one can perceive a picture. For myself, I love shapes and Colors of many forms, whereas the meaning is often irrelevant or the picture transforms some feeling of tranquility at best. Other people love meaning above everything, see the lomo lovers, they dwell in feelings allone.
See my favorites or my galleries on flickr: hail to the laundromat, light and colour, elevated roads and rails, urban photography, tender is the night.
These images have been collected over more than three years. They have an astonishing consistency regarding the amount of meaning, colour and shape. These images inspire me and push me with my own photography.
It is obvious that quite a lot of them have an urban background. I have been asked often by people, what it is I connect with urban scenes. I never knew a good answer other than “I think it looks cool”. Now that I really think about it, I might say I know.
Most people only see chaos and noise and feel unsettled when viewing urban imagery. Example:

(c) by *toki - http://www.flickr.com/photos/toki_dub/2919145344
But what I see is tranquility. The movements are frozen, you have a good viewpoint and can see the big picture. (That is why I spend such a great deal of time finding good viewpoints for my own images - to create that feeling of remoteness) You can let your eye wander, gather the proportions of the city, try to fathom the content and purpose of buildings. All of that without any disturbance. You can think about what people might be doing as you see the scene.
Or this is what I do most of the time: you can lose yourself in the astonishing colour and shapes that the millions of lights of a city create. The overwhelming complexity and interaction of human made structures can be glimpsed and felt - a feeling that is quite strong for me. And I know that there are other people out there, that feel the same about urban photography! I know it by the comments and discussions I had, and that makes me very happy.
One other important aspect for me is the level of detail an image provides. The larger the resolution, the more details you get, the more you can loose yourself in an image. That is the reason for me to go large format 8x10 at least and why I can’t settle for anything less! This kind of technology gives me the opportunity to have 600 Megapixels and 2 meter printouts at 300dpi. Most people say technology is not important for a good picture. And if you remember my last post - they are right - if an image evokes enough feelings, it doesn’t matter with what camera it has been shot. But the feeling I want to create requires a great deal of detail and doesn’t allow for blurred images, so there is no absolute answer to the question if the tool matters - it all depends - for me it matters, ‘cause I need MPix!
I will try to improve my own imagery and want to create thousands of pictures with colour, shape and a feeling of tranquil complexity in cities. Stay tuned and watch me progress.
Photography is everywhere. When I walk through the streets of Berlin on a saturday afternoon, I have the impression that half of the population owns a digital SLR and the other half some kind of point and shoot camera. And everyone is snapping happily away. You can see the results on flickr.
Most of these images don’t mean anything to me. They may mean something to the people that have been shooting them or that are involved in some form.
Then there are images, that mean something to many people. What is the difference?
In my opinion it is not some form of golden ratios or a specific set of rules that has been followed each and every time religously. It is not entirely a visual thing as well. For me a good image is the result of meaning + shape + colour. An image doesn’t need to include all three elements, but it might be easier to reach a high result of emotional connection to any given image, if it incorporates every one of the three qualities.
Meaning - Meaning is something that an image can transport by evoking feelings, memories or desires. This is because our brains associate, reflect and process the content of an image based on experiences, knowledge and values that are the core of every personality viewing an image. Every image can transport a message to some degree. Different people have different minds and perceive different meanings with different intensity. Nevertheless I would say that pictures involving humans evoke the strongest and most consistent emotions among most people.
Shape - Shape is all about geometry, vantage points, lines, angles and proportions. We perceive certain forms as harmonic, while others don’t please our eyes.
Colour - The colour of an image is the third important ingredient. Is it in balance throughout the entire image? Are there contrasts, that lead our eyes, that feel good or bad?
Let me give you some examples here (it doesn’t mean that the specific images lack one or the other quality, it does only mean that the mentioned qualities are so dominant, that I feel these are responsible for me beeing connected to the picture)
meaning + shape + color

(c) by Rivo Sarapik - http://www.flickr.com/photos/rivos/448267405
meaning + color

(C) by alex magalhaes - http://www.flickr.com/photos/alexmagalhaes/2999176086
meaning + shape

(c) by Robert Doisneau
color + shape

(c) by Doruk Bayer - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dorukbayer/389637881
shape

(c) by Charlie Xia - http://www.flickr.com/photos/charliexia/510781144
color

(C) by Edward Olive - http://www.flickr.com/photos/edwardolive/2142418106
meaning:

(c) by robert capa
The selection is from some of my alltime favorites and reflects my personal view on photography that I can connect to.
After reading my last post about how to become a millionaire, I think the most important aspect is, to never start the process with the number in mind in the first place. So my goal is not to become a millionaire. What for, it’s just a number - if I reach it one day, fine, if not - it depends.
My primary goal is to be able to do what I want in my life. I don’t want to be forced to cancel things I fathom, just because I don’t have the money. Currently I am in such a phase of my life - I want much and have too little. But staring at that million Euro border is limiting my thoughts - the amount is not important.
The only thing that is important for me personally is the amount of money I need in a month to live the lifestyle I want - so let’s take a look at the figures to get a more differentiated picture:
now to the financial backing I need for the fulfillment of my desires:
One time investments:
This would amount to 10.550€ - since I intend to make a 3 year plan, this would amount to 350€ repayment for a loan.
The final math looks like this now: 2.700€ base + 8.700€ desires + 350€ investment repayment = 11.750€ per month I need after taxes.
To earn such an amount of money with my daytimejob as an IT consultant for one of the largest IT companies in the world would easyly take more than 20 years to achieve if I work my ass off and don’t do ANYTHING else. So this is inacceptable.
But it is a revelation too: to live the life I dream of, doesn’t require me to become a millionaire, but only a mere 12K€ a month!
So here is my plan of how to achieve this:
I will pursue my dream of taking 10 large format images a day. I consider 10% of my images to be quite good enogh for hanging on a wall and 1% to be potential killer images that sell massively. So after doing the math one can easily see, that at the given rate I could publish one image per day for sale. Let’s assume a month has 30 days - this would mean that I would only need a profit per image of 400€ - this seems so much more realistic to achieve than some abstract goal of earning 1.000.000€.
I even have a plan of how to cash in on these images - I will create a shop, and sell one new image every day in 3 different editions, all highly limited and every sole edition making at least 400€ of profit, if it’s a better image it could make 1.600€ in profit and cover 4 days, taking out pressure to succeed, and if killer image, it could cover 14 days of profit. For Example:
I consider the market for my imagery to be quite endless. Many people want original images on their wall, no 10€ posters that everyone has. But original artwork of photography masters is damn expensive, so they shop the midmarket of limited but not overpriced originals. The success of midmarket galleries like yellow korner or lumas that cater the 100€ - 1000€ range is proof enough. The best thing about that market is, that not the name is the key purchasing trigger, but the perceived quality of the imagery, and that is an arena I have no problem picking up fights for attention. Further nurtured by the evergrowing importance of social networks and the fact that open web personalities can gather lots of attention. So I make my venture public, open my accounts and motivate everyone purchasing my photos to see the person behind the lens and do something good and fuel my desire pursuit. I hope this also motivates people to do their thing respectively. The tagline could be: independent images for independent minds.
I can’t wait to start, and will talk about the transition from wage slave to knight of desire pursuit and about my photography philosophy during my next posts!